Navigating the Mortgage Serviceability Buffer: A Double-Edged Sword for Homeownership

Photo by RDNE Stock project: https://www.pexels.com/photo/gray-and-black-desk-calculator-8292896/

The Australian housing market is a constant topic of conversation, especially for aspiring homeowners. A key player in this landscape is the mortgage serviceability buffer rate, a regulatory measure set by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA). It ensures borrowers can manage loan repayments even if interest rates increase. Originally set at 2% above the loan's interest rate, it was raised to 3.0% during the pandemic in 2021, and there are now proposals to reduce it back to 2.5%.

Recent discussions have highlighted a crucial aspect of this proposed reduction: while it aims to make homeownership more accessible, it also carries the risk of inadvertently fueling property price growth, potentially undermining its very purpose.

The Intended Path to Homeownership: Wider Access and Increased Capacity

The primary goal of reducing the serviceability buffer from 3.0% to 2.5% is to widen the path to homeownership for many Australians. Modelling indicates several significant benefits:

• Expanded Loan Eligibility: A 0.5% reduction in the buffer significantly lowers income thresholds, allowing a broader group of individuals who were previously excluded by stricter conditions to become eligible for loans.

• More Homeowners: An estimated 269,862 more individuals could gain access to median value houses. This change could lower the required income for a median home loan from $74,332 to $70,662, directly benefiting those just below the current approval threshold.

• Increased Borrowing Power: The buffer reduction could boost borrowing capacity by 5% across the board. Nationally, this translates to an impressive $276 billion in additional capacity. For an average Australian income earner, this means an extra $18,816.65 in borrowing power.

• Key Beneficiaries:

    ◦ The 25–34 age group is expected to see the largest rise in potential home buyers, with 119,000 more able to qualify, representing a 12% increase. This demographic is also the largest renter group.

    ◦ Most new potential borrowers would fall within the $700,000–$800,000 loan range, particularly those aged 25–34.

    ◦ The greatest relative impact, however, is seen among those qualifying for loans over $1.5 million, suggesting a disproportionate benefit for younger, income-rich cohorts previously closer to borrowing thresholds for higher-end properties.

    ◦ For first home buyers using a 5% deposit, common for this group, the greatest access gains are seen for loans under $900,000. This also leads to a more even distribution of borrowing potential across age groups, particularly for middle-income earners who may struggle with larger deposits.

• Relief for Existing Mortgage Holders: Beyond new buyers, the reduced buffer could also ease debt stress for current mortgage holders, potentially freeing up "mortgage prisoners" to refinance their loans to more competitive rates. This is particularly relevant in Australia, where 1% of loans are refinanced monthly.

The Counterpoint: The Risk of Fuelling Property Prices

While the benefits for accessibility are clear, a significant concern, which we've discussed, is the potential for this policy to inadvertently fuel property price growth, thereby undermining its ultimate purpose.

Here’s why this is a critical consideration:

• Increased Housing Demand: Reducing the serviceability buffer is highly likely to increase overall housing demand. This is because it expands the pool of eligible buyers, allowing more people to enter the market.

• Intensified Competition: The influx of new buyers, especially first home buyers (nearly 40% of whom are currently blocked by serviceability rules), will intensify competition for available properties.

• Upward Pressure on Prices: This increased demand and competition could unintentionally drive-up property values, potentially pricing out the very buyers it aims to help.

Historical Precedent: This isn't just theoretical. Historical precedents, such as Canada's 2018 buffer changes, have shown that such policies can fuel price growth. Without careful balance, the improved access achieved by the buffer reduction could be negated by rising prices, ultimately undermining affordability.

Hypothetical Graph: Impact of 0.5% Serviceability Buffer Reduction

Conclusion: Balancing Access with Affordability

The proposed reduction of Australia's mortgage serviceability buffer presents a complex scenario. On one hand, it promises to unlock significant borrowing capacity and enable hundreds of thousands more individuals, particularly younger buyers, to access homeownership. It also offers a much-needed reprieve for existing mortgage holders struggling with high rates.

However, the critical counterpoint is the very real risk that increased demand could fuel property price growth, ultimately making homes less affordable and undermining the core purpose of improving access. As seen in other markets, policies designed to ease access can inadvertently exacerbate affordability challenges.

Moving forward, any decision on the buffer rate will require a careful balance to ensure that the goal of widening the path to homeownership isn't unintentionally sabotaged by a surge in property values.